I really do not see why they want to open source even of there is enough demand? Isn’t diminishing demand THE argument pro releasing the source for free? CDE is dying because it is not free, yet.
The point is that there is lot of deployments of this legacy environment which would help greatly if they were able to customize and maintain it further.
They claim that if there is enough to demand *to open source it*, they will. Not that if the product is not worthy, we will dump code out.
whats their point?
I really do not see why they want to open source even of there is enough demand? Isn’t diminishing demand THE argument pro releasing the source for free? CDE is dying because it is not free, yet.
Anonymous
October 13, 2006 at 12:48 pm
Re: whats their point?
The point is that there is lot of deployments of this legacy environment which would help greatly if they were able to customize and maintain it further.
They claim that if there is enough to demand *to open source it*, they will. Not that if the product is not worthy, we will dump code out.
mether
October 13, 2006 at 12:52 pm
Thanks for the support rahulsundram
Peter Howkins
Anonymous
October 16, 2006 at 10:59 pm